PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDAQ vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's 10.41% return.


TDAQ

1D
0.65%
1M
10.93%
YTD
20.71%
6M
20.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.93%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.07%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDAQ and QDVO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

0.86

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDAQ
QDVO

Technology

54.2%
50.6%

Communication Services

15.5%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.6%

Industrials

2.8%
1.7%

Utilities

1.4%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
0.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDAQ
54.2%
QDVO
50.6%

Communication Services

TDAQ
15.5%
QDVO
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TDAQ
12.2%
QDVO
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

TDAQ
7.6%
QDVO
6.3%

Healthcare

TDAQ
4.2%
QDVO
4.6%

Industrials

TDAQ
2.8%
QDVO
1.7%

Utilities

TDAQ
1.4%
QDVO
0.7%

Basic Materials

TDAQ
1.2%
QDVO
1.8%

Energy

TDAQ
0.6%
QDVO
0.8%

Financial Services

TDAQ
0.2%
QDVO
4.1%

Real Estate

TDAQ
0.1%
QDVO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDAQ vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDAQ

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDAQQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.62

1.44

+1.18

Drawdowns

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDAQQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-17.75%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-2.37%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

Volatility

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDAQQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

12.22%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.46%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.46%

-0.29%

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDAQ vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, which matches QDVO's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.07%9.92%2.79%
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
10.05%4.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDAQ and QDVO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for TDAQ.

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 10.05% for TDAQ.

They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TDAQ and 0.55% for QDVO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDAQ and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer