TCV vs. XSVM
TCV (Towle Value ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Towle, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. TCV is actively managed, while XSVM is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TCV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
TCV vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCV achieves a 24.97% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 22.71% return.
TCV
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
TCV vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCV Towle Value ETF | 24.97% | 2.99% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 22.71% | 8.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCV and XSVM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCV vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
TCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XSVM
TCV vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Towle Value ETF (TCV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCV vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCV drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCV and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -62.57% | +50.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -1.42% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -11.52% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility
TCV vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 18.24% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 22.48% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 25.00% | -3.74% |
TCV vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCV vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than XSVM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.58% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCV and XSVM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.58% for TCV.
TCV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Towle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TCV and 0.37% for XSVM.
Find the right allocation for TCV and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer