TCV vs. UPSD
TCV (Towle Value ETF) and UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Towle, while UPSD is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Aptus. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCV returned 32.54% vs 18.27% for UPSD. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TCV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UPSD.
Performance
TCV vs. UPSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCV achieves a 28.70% return, which is significantly higher than UPSD's 8.80% return.
TCV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- YTD
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 32.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSD
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCV vs. UPSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCV Towle Value ETF | 28.70% | 2.99% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 8.80% | 8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCV and UPSD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCV vs. UPSD — Risk / Return Rank
TCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPSD
TCV vs. UPSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Towle Value ETF (TCV) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCV | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCV vs. UPSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCV drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum UPSD drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCV and UPSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCV | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -23.85% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -11.91% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -3.76% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility
TCV vs. UPSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCV | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 14.27% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 20.71% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 20.71% | +0.41% |
TCV vs. UPSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UPSD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCV vs. UPSD - Dividend Comparison
TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than UPSD's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCV and UPSD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, TCV leads with 32.54% vs 18.27% for UPSD. On fees, UPSD is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TCV has performed better with a 32.54% return vs 18.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPSD is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
UPSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.56% for TCV.
TCV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while UPSD is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Towle and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TCV and 0.79% for UPSD.
Find the right allocation for TCV and UPSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer