TCOM vs. ACGL
TCOM (Trip.com Group Limited) and ACGL (Arch Capital Group Ltd.) are both stocks. TCOM operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while ACGL operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TCOM returned 0.25%/yr vs 16.29%/yr for ACGL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TCOM vs. ACGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -40.48% return, which is significantly lower than ACGL's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TCOM has underperformed ACGL with an annualized return of 0.25%, while ACGL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.29% annualized return.
TCOM
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- 6M
- -43.43%
- YTD
- -40.48%
- 1Y
- -30.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 0.25%
ACGL
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
TCOM vs. ACGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | -40.48% | 5.24% | 90.67% | 4.68% | 39.72% | -27.01% | 0.57% | 23.95% | -38.64% | 10.25% |
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 5.36% | 3.87% | 30.76% | 18.30% | 41.24% | 23.23% | -15.90% | 60.52% | -11.69% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCOM and ACGL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2003 | 0.22 |
The correlation between TCOM and ACGL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TCOM:
$26.95B
ACGL:
$35.31B
TCOM:
CN¥45.41
ACGL:
$13.15
TCOM:
6.39
ACGL:
7.69
TCOM:
0.04
ACGL:
0.17
TCOM:
3.12
ACGL:
1.90
TCOM:
1.20
ACGL:
1.56
TCOM:
CN¥64.48B
ACGL:
$19.70B
TCOM:
CN¥51.79B
ACGL:
$8.44B
TCOM:
CN¥39.20B
ACGL:
$5.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCOM vs. ACGL — Risk / Return Rank
TCOM
ACGL
TCOM vs. ACGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCOM | ACGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 1.01 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 2.61 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCOM vs. ACGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, which is greater than ACGL's maximum drawdown of -54.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and ACGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCOM | ACGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.34% | -54.70% | -21.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.54% | -14.08% | -35.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -22.43% | -27.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -22.43% | -27.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.96% | -53.84% | -18.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.80% | -7.47% | -38.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.89% | -11.72% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.98% | 5.43% | +19.55% |
Volatility
TCOM vs. ACGL - Volatility Comparison
Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) at 6.08%. This indicates that TCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCOM | ACGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | 6.08% | +10.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.02% | 15.58% | +15.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.00% | 20.84% | +17.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.47% | 24.51% | +24.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 27.56% | +16.86% |
Dividends
TCOM vs. ACGL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TCOM nor ACGL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% |
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Financials
TCOM vs. ACGL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trip.com Group Limited and Arch Capital Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TCOM vs. ACGL - Profitability Comparison
TCOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 16.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.
ACGL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.27B and revenue of 4.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.
TCOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.92B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
ACGL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 4.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.
TCOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
ACGL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported a net income of 1.05B and revenue of 4.36B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TCOM and ACGL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCOM has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to ACGL (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCOM dropped -76.34% vs ACGL's -54.70%.
ACGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCOM and ACGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer