PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCMD vs. UMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCMD vs. UMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCMD achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than UMC's 146.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMD has underperformed UMC with an annualized return of 7.91%, while UMC has yielded a comparatively higher 31.85% annualized return.


TCMD

1D
-0.11%
1M
-10.14%
6M
-2.39%
YTD
-2.86%
1Y
191.92%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-10.47%
10Y*
7.91%
ALL TIME*
10.52%

UMC

1D
0.48%
1M
-21.09%
6M
90.23%
YTD
146.37%
1Y
184.36%
3Y*
42.98%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
31.85%
ALL TIME*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.74M$6.38M$7.64M
$331.44M$369.70M$380.82M

TCMD vs. UMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCMD
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.
-2.86%69.29%19.79%24.56%-39.67%-57.65%-33.43%48.21%57.18%76.60%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
146.37%28.65%-19.01%39.20%-40.32%43.16%230.69%56.10%-21.85%39.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TCMD and UMC is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCMD:

$635.41M

UMC:

$47.47B

EPS

TCMD:

$0.89

UMC:

NT$41.67

PE Ratio

TCMD:

31.51

UMC:

14.79

PS Ratio

TCMD:

1.86

UMC:

4.93

PB Ratio

TCMD:

2.92

UMC:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCMD:

$343.52M

UMC:

NT$250.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCMD:

$254.06M

UMC:

NT$76.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCMD:

$38.53M

UMC:

NT$156.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCMD vs. UMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCMD
TCMD Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TCMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TCMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UMC
UMC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
UMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
UMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCMD vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCMDUMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.47

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

4.87

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

14.42

-1.46

TCMD vs. UMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the UMC Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMD and UMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCMD vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMD drawdown since its inception was -91.41%, which is greater than UMC's maximum drawdown of -72.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMD and UMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCMDUMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.41%

-72.52%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.13%

-37.84%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.91%

-37.84%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.74%

-54.30%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.41%

-54.30%

-37.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.08%

-30.86%

-32.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.55%

-42.39%

-7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.13%

12.76%

+1.37%

Volatility

TCMD vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) is 11.32%, while United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a volatility of 24.73%. This indicates that TCMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCMDUMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

24.73%

-13.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.11%

50.05%

-13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.40%

60.25%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.63%

42.41%

+18.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.39%

41.08%

+15.31%

Dividends

TCMD vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison

TCMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCMD
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
2.17%6.06%7.14%6.93%7.92%2.44%1.62%3.51%6.59%2.41%3.61%3.15%

Financials

TCMD vs. UMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TCMD vs. UMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TCMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.71M and revenue of 75.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

UMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 22.32B and revenue of 68.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

TCMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.53M and revenue of 75.27M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.0%.

UMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 14.88B and revenue of 68.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.

TCMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -1.76M and revenue of 75.27M, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

UMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 42.26B and revenue of 68.73B, resulting in a net margin of 61.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCMD and UMC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMC has higher volatility (24.73%) compared to TCMD (11.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMD dropped -91.41% vs UMC's -72.52%.

UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCMD and UMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer