PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCMD vs. UMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCMD vs. UMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCMD achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than UMC's 185.75% return.


TCMD

1D
1.79%
1M
6.64%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-6.65%
1Y
146.81%
3Y*
1.69%
5Y*
-13.59%
10Y*

UMC

1D
-1.88%
1M
72.11%
YTD
185.75%
6M
188.69%
1Y
209.05%
3Y*
48.17%
5Y*
25.39%
10Y*
34.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCMD vs. UMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCMD
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.
-15.83%69.29%19.79%24.56%-39.67%-57.65%-33.43%48.21%57.18%76.60%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
185.75%28.65%-19.01%39.20%-40.32%43.16%230.69%56.10%-21.85%39.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TCMD and UMC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCMD:

$550.72M

UMC:

$11.30B

EPS

TCMD:

$0.89

UMC:

$24.95

PE Ratio

TCMD:

27.47

UMC:

0.90

PS Ratio

TCMD:

1.62

UMC:

0.19

PB Ratio

TCMD:

2.53

UMC:

0.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCMD:

$343.52M

UMC:

$240.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCMD:

$254.06M

UMC:

$71.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCMD:

$38.53M

UMC:

$119.50B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCMD vs. UMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCMD
TCMD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TCMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TCMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

UMC
UMC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
UMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
UMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCMD vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCMDUMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

4.35

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

5.17

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.65

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

6.89

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.69

17.54

-5.85

TCMD vs. UMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is lower than the UMC Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMD and UMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCMDUMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

4.35

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.65

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.18

-0.03

Drawdowns

TCMD vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMD drawdown since its inception was -91.41%, which is greater than UMC's maximum drawdown of -72.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMD and UMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCMDUMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.41%

-72.52%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.13%

-31.01%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.25%

-36.00%

-27.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.51%

-54.30%

-34.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.00%

-1.88%

-66.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.34%

-42.58%

-6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.58%

12.17%

+0.41%

Volatility

TCMD vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) is 15.06%, while United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a volatility of 19.06%. This indicates that TCMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCMDUMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

19.06%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

42.46%

-6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.76%

48.41%

+17.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.49%

39.49%

+21.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.63%

39.53%

+17.10%

Dividends

TCMD vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison

TCMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCMD
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
2.12%6.06%7.14%6.93%7.92%2.44%1.62%3.51%6.59%2.41%3.61%3.15%

Financials

TCMD vs. UMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
75.27M
61.04B
(TCMD) Total Revenue
(UMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TCMD vs. UMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
68.7%
29.2%
Portfolio components
TCMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.71M and revenue of 75.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

UMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 17.82B and revenue of 61.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.

TCMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.53M and revenue of 75.27M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.0%.

UMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 11.22B and revenue of 61.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

TCMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -1.76M and revenue of 75.27M, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

UMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 16.17B and revenue of 61.04B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCMD and UMC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMC has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to TCMD (15.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMD dropped -91.41% vs UMC's -72.52%.

UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCMD and UMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer