UMC vs. AATC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC).

Performance

UMC vs. AATC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UMC vs. AATC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation	14.12%	28.65%	-19.01%	39.20%	-40.32%	27.73%
AATC Autoscope Technologies Corporation	-4.18%	-11.52%	43.25%	115.94%	-37.85%	-0.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap UMC : $22.40B AATC : $29.81M
EPS UMC : $16.62 AATC : $0.25
PE Ratio UMC : 0.54 AATC : 21.38
PS Ratio UMC : 0.09 AATC : 3.31
PB Ratio UMC : 0.06 AATC : 2.91
Total Revenue (TTM) UMC : $238.14B AATC : $9.01M
Gross Profit (TTM) UMC : $68.91B AATC : $8.79M
EBITDA (TTM) UMC : $109.50B AATC : $2.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMC achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than AATC's -4.18% return.

UMC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -14.65%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 21.05%
• 1Y: 36.51%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 21.07%

AATC

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: -4.18%
• 6M: -15.42%
• 1Y: -26.62%
• 3Y*: 33.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UMC vs. AATC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMC

UMC Risk / Return Rank: 68
UMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
UMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
UMC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UMC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AATC

AATC Risk / Return Rank: 6
AATC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
AATC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
AATC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
AATC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
AATC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMC vs. AATC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMC	AATC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	-0.99	+1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	-1.30	+2.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.83	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	-0.92	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.95	-1.60	+4.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMC vs. AATC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the AATC Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMC and AATC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMC	AATC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	-0.99	+1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.31	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between UMC and AATC is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UMC vs. AATC - Dividend Comparison

UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than AATC's 11.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation	5.31%	6.06%	7.14%	6.93%	7.92%	2.44%	1.62%	3.51%	6.59%	2.41%	3.61%	3.15%
AATC Autoscope Technologies Corporation	11.06%	28.40%	23.25%	7.38%	13.33%	3.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UMC vs. AATC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMC drawdown since its inception was -72.52%, which is greater than AATC's maximum drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMC and AATC.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMC	AATC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.52%	-53.27%	-19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.01%	-28.74%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.13%	-31.62%	+3.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-20.42%	-22.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.29%	16.57%	-5.28%

Volatility

UMC vs. AATC - Volatility Comparison

United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a higher volatility of 9.62% compared to Autoscope Technologies Corporation (AATC) at 6.87%. This indicates that UMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AATC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMC	AATC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.62%	6.87%	+2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.25%	17.96%	+16.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.98%	26.91%	+14.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.13%	35.20%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.39%	35.20%	+3.19%

Financials

UMC vs. AATC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Microelectronics Corporation and Autoscope Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 18.96B and revenue of 62.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.4%.

AATC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02M and revenue of 2.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

UMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 12.23B and revenue of 62.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

AATC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 563.00K and revenue of 2.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

UMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 10.06B and revenue of 62.39B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.

AATC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoscope Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 471.00K and revenue of 2.10M, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.