PortfoliosLab logo
UMC vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UMC and COST is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UMC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
44.01%
4,398.16%
UMC
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UMC:

-0.07

COST:

1.50

Sortino Ratio

UMC:

0.10

COST:

2.09

Omega Ratio

UMC:

1.01

COST:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

UMC:

-0.09

COST:

1.96

Martin Ratio

UMC:

-0.21

COST:

5.76

Ulcer Index

UMC:

19.23%

COST:

5.88%

Daily Std Dev

UMC:

36.17%

COST:

21.94%

Max Drawdown

UMC:

-85.96%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

UMC:

-28.61%

COST:

-6.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UMC:

$18.59B

COST:

$450.29B

EPS

UMC:

$0.58

COST:

$17.15

PE Ratio

UMC:

12.76

COST:

59.18

PEG Ratio

UMC:

1.61

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

UMC:

0.08

COST:

1.71

PB Ratio

UMC:

1.52

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

UMC:

$235.53B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UMC:

$73.41B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

UMC:

$104.15B

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMC achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, UMC has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 18.52%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.66% annualized return.


UMC

YTD

13.71%

1M

20.59%

6M

1.93%

1Y

-2.60%

5Y*

30.57%

10Y*

18.52%

COST

YTD

10.24%

1M

11.03%

6M

10.53%

1Y

32.68%

5Y*

29.14%

10Y*

23.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UMC vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMC is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMC is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMC is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMC is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMC is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMC is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UMC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMC and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.07
1.50
UMC
COST

Dividends

UMC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
6.27%7.13%6.93%7.92%2.44%1.61%3.51%6.59%3.47%5.03%4.73%3.66%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

UMC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMC drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMC and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-28.61%
-6.30%
UMC
COST

Volatility

UMC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 8.28%. This indicates that UMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.28%
8.28%
UMC
COST

Financials

UMC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Microelectronics Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
57.86B
63.72B
(UMC) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UMC vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Microelectronics Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
26.7%
15.1%
(UMC) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
UMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.45B and revenue of 57.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

UMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 9.79B and revenue of 57.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

UMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 7.78B and revenue of 57.86B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.