PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCMD vs. MDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCMD vs. MDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) and Medtronic plc (MDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCMD achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -22.60% return.


TCMD

1D
1.79%
1M
6.64%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-6.65%
1Y
146.81%
3Y*
1.69%
5Y*
-13.59%
10Y*

MDT

1D
-0.31%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
-22.60%
6M
-26.59%
1Y
-9.13%
3Y*
-0.99%
5Y*
-6.94%
10Y*
1.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCMD vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCMD
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.
-15.83%69.29%19.79%24.56%-39.67%-57.65%-33.43%48.21%57.18%76.60%
MDT
Medtronic plc
-22.60%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TCMD and MDT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCMD:

$550.72M

MDT:

$95.00B

EPS

TCMD:

$0.89

MDT:

$3.58

PE Ratio

TCMD:

27.47

MDT:

20.58

PEG Ratio

TCMD:

0.69

MDT:

1.86

PS Ratio

TCMD:

1.62

MDT:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCMD:

$343.52M

MDT:

$35.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCMD:

$254.06M

MDT:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCMD:

$38.53M

MDT:

$7.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCMD vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCMD
TCMD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TCMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TCMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCMD vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCMDMDTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

-0.47

+2.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

-0.56

+4.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.94

+0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

-0.29

+4.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.69

-0.77

+12.46

TCMD vs. MDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the MDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCMD and MDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCMDMDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

-0.47

+2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

-0.32

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.46

-0.31

Drawdowns

TCMD vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCMD drawdown since its inception was -91.41%, which is greater than MDT's maximum drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMD and MDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCMDMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.41%

-57.63%

-33.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.13%

-28.90%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.25%

-28.90%

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.51%

-45.10%

-43.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.00%

-36.76%

-31.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.34%

-16.54%

-32.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.58%

10.81%

+1.77%

Volatility

TCMD vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison

Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to Medtronic plc (MDT) at 6.62%. This indicates that TCMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCMDMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

6.62%

+8.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

14.30%

+21.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.76%

19.63%

+46.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.49%

21.66%

+38.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.63%

23.12%

+33.51%

Dividends

TCMD vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison

TCMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.85%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%
TCMD
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TCMD vs. MDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
75.27M
9.02B
(TCMD) Total Revenue
(MDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TCMD and MDT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCMD has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to MDT (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMD dropped -91.41% vs MDT's -57.63%.

TCMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCMD and MDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer