PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMC vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMC vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMC achieves a 233.33% return, which is significantly higher than EWT's 65.65% return. Over the past 10 years, UMC has outperformed EWT with an annualized return of 36.17%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively lower 20.43% annualized return.


UMC

1D
-4.73%
1M
43.80%
YTD
233.33%
6M
228.73%
1Y
242.75%
3Y*
55.11%
5Y*
29.56%
10Y*
36.17%

EWT

1D
-5.64%
1M
8.67%
YTD
65.65%
6M
68.38%
1Y
99.48%
3Y*
39.48%
5Y*
19.11%
10Y*
20.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMC vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
233.33%28.65%-19.01%39.20%-40.32%43.16%230.69%56.10%-21.85%39.99%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
65.65%28.38%16.11%29.00%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UMC and EWT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2000

0.61

The correlation between UMC and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMC vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMC
UMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
UMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMC vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UMCEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.58

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.88

9.52

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.75

27.93

-8.18

UMC vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMC Sharpe Ratio is 4.53, which is comparable to the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMC and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMC vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMC drawdown since its inception was -72.52%, which is greater than EWT's maximum drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMC and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMCEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.52%

-64.37%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.01%

-10.51%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.00%

-25.66%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.30%

-38.88%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.30%

-38.88%

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-5.64%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-19.13%

-23.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

3.57%

+8.78%

Volatility

UMC vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a higher volatility of 28.63% compared to iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) at 14.88%. This indicates that UMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMCEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.63%

14.88%

+13.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.45%

23.89%

+24.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.96%

27.85%

+26.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.87%

23.16%

+17.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.23%

21.80%

+18.43%

Dividends

UMC vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than EWT's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.68%4.43%3.32%12.01%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
1.82%6.06%7.14%6.93%7.92%2.44%1.62%3.51%6.59%2.41%3.61%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMC and EWT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMC has higher volatility (28.63%) compared to EWT (14.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMC dropped -72.52% vs EWT's -64.37%.

UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMC and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer