UMC vs. EWT
UMC (United Microelectronics Corporation) is a stock, while EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) is Taiwan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, UMC returned 31.85%/yr vs 17.98%/yr for EWT. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
UMC vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMC achieves a 146.37% return, which is significantly higher than EWT's 51.98% return. Over the past 10 years, UMC has outperformed EWT with an annualized return of 31.85%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively lower 17.98% annualized return.
UMC
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -21.09%
- 6M
- 90.23%
- YTD
- 146.37%
- 1Y
- 184.36%
- 3Y*
- 42.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 31.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.14%
EWT
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- 6M
- 41.86%
- YTD
- 51.98%
- 1Y
- 72.95%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 16.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $630.60M | $678.43M | $665.11M | |
| $331.44M | $369.70M | $380.82M |
UMC vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 146.37% | 28.65% | -19.01% | 39.20% | -40.32% | 43.16% | 230.69% | 56.10% | -21.85% | 39.99% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 51.98% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 29.00% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMC and EWT is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2000 | 0.61 |
The correlation between UMC and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMC vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
UMC
EWT
UMC vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMC | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 3.70 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 15.15 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMC vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMC drawdown since its inception was -72.52%, which is greater than EWT's maximum drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMC and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMC | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.52% | -64.37% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.84% | -19.83% | -18.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.84% | -25.66% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.30% | -38.88% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.30% | -38.88% | -15.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.86% | -13.43% | -17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.39% | -19.09% | -23.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.76% | 4.84% | +7.92% |
Volatility
UMC vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a higher volatility of 24.73% compared to iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) at 13.40%. This indicates that UMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMC | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.73% | 13.40% | +11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | 27.56% | +22.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.25% | 30.78% | +29.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.41% | 23.94% | +18.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 22.19% | +18.89% |
Dividends
UMC vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than EWT's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.92% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 2.17% | 6.06% | 7.14% | 6.93% | 7.92% | 2.44% | 1.62% | 3.51% | 6.59% | 2.41% | 3.61% | 3.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMC and EWT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMC has higher volatility (24.73%) compared to EWT (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMC dropped -72.52% vs EWT's -64.37%.
UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMC and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer