TCLRX vs. TILGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TCLRX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund) and TILGX (TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - TCLRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by TIAA Investments, while TILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by TIAA Investments. Over the past 10 years, TCLRX returned 9.54%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for TILGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCLRX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TILGX.

Performance

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund (TCLRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLRX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLRX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 9.54%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.

TCLRX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 6M: 6.53%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 9.54%

TILGX

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 20.44%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: 16.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCLRX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund	6.89%	15.07%	11.00%	16.13%	-16.19%	12.38%	15.07%	22.77%	-8.30%	18.45%
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class	3.61%	15.25%	29.23%	47.05%	-32.76%	16.84%	44.23%	30.76%	-0.38%	33.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLRX and TILGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2006	0.91

The correlation between TCLRX and TILGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TCLRX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLRX

TCLRX Risk / Return Rank: 57
TCLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TCLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TCLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TCLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TCLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

TILGX

TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund (TCLRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCLRX	TILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.22	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.71	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.22	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.30	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.36	4.30	+7.06

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the TILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLRX and TILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLRX drawdown since its inception was -53.91%, roughly equal to the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLRX and TILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCLRX	TILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.91%	-52.16%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-15.19%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.24%	-23.94%	+12.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.09%	-37.86%	+14.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.96%	-37.86%	+9.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-4.25%	+4.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-8.83%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	4.58%	-2.96%

Volatility

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund (TCLRX) is 3.48%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that TCLRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCLRX	TILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	5.27%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.44%	12.12%	-4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.04%	16.18%	-7.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.27%	21.96%	-10.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.63%	21.66%	-9.03%

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLRX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCLRX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison

TCLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than TILGX's 13.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TCLRX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2035 Fund	4.53%	4.85%	2.74%	1.61%	5.83%	7.91%	5.16%	3.80%	6.54%	2.60%	5.11%	5.35%
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class	13.39%	13.87%	6.41%	0.22%	0.42%	10.49%	37.04%	4.41%	14.12%	3.83%	1.82%	3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCLRX and TILGX in my portfolio?

TCLRX and TILGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCLRX or TILGX?

TILGX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to TCLRX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLRX dropped -53.91% vs TILGX's -52.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCLRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.