TCHP vs. TRBCX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) and TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TCHP returned 9.21%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for TRBCX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TCHP charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TRBCX.

Performance

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than TRBCX's -1.78% return.

TCHP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -5.29%
• YTD: -1.95%
• 6M: -3.17%
• 1Y: 10.84%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: —

TRBCX

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: -3.09%
• 1Y: 11.36%
• 3Y*: 25.03%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: 17.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	-1.95%	18.40%	36.06%	50.10%	-37.81%	18.08%	11.58%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	-1.78%	18.78%	48.46%	49.42%	-38.57%	17.54%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TCHP and TRBCX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020	0.98

The correlation between TCHP and TRBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TCHP vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHP

TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 19
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 19

TRBCX

TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 9
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCHP	TRBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.74	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.08	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.14	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	0.77	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.01	2.52	-0.51

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHP and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and TRBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCHP	TRBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.34%	-54.56%	+12.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-17.01%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	-23.08%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.34%	-43.63%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.79%	-7.52%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.40%	-11.29%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.40%	5.16%	+0.24%

Volatility

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCHP	TRBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	6.71%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	14.55%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	17.70%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.58%	24.17%	-0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	22.84%	+0.37%

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCHP vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.34%	5.25%	18.16%	3.49%	5.87%	9.38%	1.19%	0.36%	2.44%	2.94%	0.67%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCHP and TRBCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, TCHP and TRBCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TCHP or TRBCX?

TCHP has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to TRBCX (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.