TCHI vs. ARMH
TCHI (iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TCHI is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. TCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
TCHI vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TCHI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCHI vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | 1.90% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHI and ARMH is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCHI vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
TCHI
ARMH
TCHI vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCHI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCHI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 471,500.14 | -471,500.05 |
Drawdowns
TCHI vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHI drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHI and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.96% | -1.61% | -42.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | 0.00% | -2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -0.40% | -21.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility
TCHI vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCHI | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.64% | 113.00% | -87.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.88% | 113.00% | -78.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.88% | 113.00% | -78.12% |
TCHI vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCHI vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
TCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.49% | 4.28% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCHI and ARMH have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TCHI.
TCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TCHI and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for TCHI and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer