TCHI vs. KWEB
TCHI (iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCHI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries Select Capped Index - Benchmark TR Net, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TCHI returned 10.94%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for KWEB. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.
Performance
TCHI vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCHI achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -15.15% return.
TCHI
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.31%
KWEB
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 15.61%
- 6M
- -16.07%
- YTD
- -15.15%
- 1Y
- -13.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.79%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- 0.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $584.55M | $558.37M | $684.65M | |
| $300.26K | $346.07K | $396.84K |
TCHI vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | 2.18% | 33.13% | 9.09% | -5.61% | -24.30% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -15.15% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -19.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHI and KWEB is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between TCHI and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TCHI vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TCHI
KWEB
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TCHI
KWEB
Consumer Cyclical
TCHI
KWEB
Communication Services
TCHI
KWEB
Industrials
TCHI
KWEB
Consumer Defensive
TCHI
KWEB
Energy
TCHI
KWEB
-
Financial Services
TCHI
KWEB
Basic Materials
TCHI
KWEB
-
Healthcare
TCHI
-
KWEB
Real Estate
TCHI
-
KWEB
Utilities
TCHI
-
KWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCHI vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
TCHI
KWEB
TCHI vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCHI | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.94 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | -0.32 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | -0.59 | +2.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCHI vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHI drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHI and KWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHI | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.96% | -80.92% | +36.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.73% | -41.62% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.78% | -41.62% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.60% | -66.59% | +55.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.96% | -35.67% | +14.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 22.13% | -12.14% |
Volatility
TCHI vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 7.47%. This indicates that TCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCHI | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 7.47% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.50% | 20.57% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.67% | 27.70% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 46.96% | -12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 40.05% | -5.13% |
TCHI vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCHI vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
TCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than KWEB's 7.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.26% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | 2.27% | 2.44% | 2.49% | 4.28% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCHI and KWEB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCHI has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to KWEB (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHI dropped -43.96% vs KWEB's -80.92%.
On 3-year performance, TCHI leads with 10.94% vs 1.79% for KWEB. On fees, TCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 7.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TCHI has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 2.27% for TCHI.
TCHI is categorized as Technology Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. TCHI tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries Select Capped Index - Benchmark TR Net, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TCHI and 0.70% for KWEB.
TCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCHI and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer