PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCHI vs. KWEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCHI vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHI achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -20.06% return.


TCHI

1D
-0.54%
1M
9.28%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.70%
1Y
44.38%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10Y*

KWEB

1D
-3.92%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-20.06%
6M
-22.24%
1Y
-12.78%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-14.28%
10Y*
0.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCHI vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TCHI
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
11.01%33.13%9.09%-5.61%-24.32%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-20.06%23.55%12.01%-9.06%-19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TCHI and KWEB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.89

The correlation between TCHI and KWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCHI vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCHI
KWEB

Technology

56.0%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
37.7%

Industrials

13.5%
3.1%

Communication Services

10.0%
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.1%

Energy

1.0%

-

Financial Services

0.6%
2.2%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Healthcare

-

6.0%

Real Estate

-

5.2%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TCHI
56.0%
KWEB
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TCHI
15.8%
KWEB
37.7%

Industrials

TCHI
13.5%
KWEB
3.1%

Communication Services

TCHI
10.0%
KWEB
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

TCHI
2.5%
KWEB
3.1%

Energy

TCHI
1.0%
KWEB

-

Financial Services

TCHI
0.6%
KWEB
2.2%

Basic Materials

TCHI
0.3%
KWEB

-

Healthcare

TCHI

-

KWEB
6.0%

Real Estate

TCHI

-

KWEB
5.2%

Utilities

TCHI

-

KWEB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCHI vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHI
TCHI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCHI vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCHIKWEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.94

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

-0.38

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

-0.76

+5.50

TCHI vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHI and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCHIKWEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

-0.47

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.06

+0.04

Drawdowns

TCHI vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHI drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHI and KWEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCHIKWEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.96%

-80.92%

+36.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.73%

-34.13%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.78%

-34.13%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-68.52%

+65.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-35.24%

+13.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

16.85%

-7.46%

Volatility

TCHI vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) is 9.03%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that TCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCHIKWEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

11.52%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.79%

20.11%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.64%

27.25%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.88%

47.67%

-12.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.88%

39.99%

-5.11%

TCHI vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCHI vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

TCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than KWEB's 7.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
7.70%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%
TCHI
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
2.19%2.44%2.49%4.28%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCHI and KWEB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KWEB has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to TCHI (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHI dropped -43.96% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

On 3-year performance, TCHI leads with 17.38% vs 4.05% for KWEB. On fees, TCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TCHI has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TCHI has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KWEB.

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 2.19% for TCHI.

TCHI is categorized as Technology Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. TCHI tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries Select Capped Index - Benchmark TR Net, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TCHI and 0.76% for KWEB.

TCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCHI and KWEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer