PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAL vs. AIFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAL vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 40.47% return.


TCAL

1D
0.57%
1M
4.06%
6M
1.48%
YTD
2.86%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIFD

1D
-0.55%
1M
-1.03%
6M
38.12%
YTD
40.47%
1Y
72.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAL vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCAL and AIFD is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.01

TCAL vs. AIFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCAL
AIFD

Healthcare

21.9%

-

Industrials

20.6%
9.8%

Financial Services

13.5%

-

Technology

11.6%
73.2%

Utilities

10.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
6.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.0%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Energy

1.2%

-

Healthcare

TCAL
21.9%
AIFD

-

Industrials

TCAL
20.6%
AIFD
9.8%

Financial Services

TCAL
13.5%
AIFD

-

Technology

TCAL
11.6%
AIFD
73.2%

Utilities

TCAL
10.0%
AIFD

-

Consumer Defensive

TCAL
9.5%
AIFD

-

Consumer Cyclical

TCAL
8.2%
AIFD
6.0%

Communication Services

TCAL
2.9%
AIFD
11.0%

Real Estate

TCAL
2.2%
AIFD

-

Basic Materials

TCAL
1.7%
AIFD

-

Energy

TCAL
1.2%
AIFD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAL vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAL
TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

AIFD
AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAL vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCALAIFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.40

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

6.20

-5.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.07

19.98

-18.91

TCAL vs. AIFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the AIFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAL and AIFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCAL vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum AIFD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and AIFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCALAIFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-33.20%

+25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-11.75%

+4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-7.86%

+7.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-5.78%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.64%

-0.73%

Volatility

TCAL vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 2.89%, while TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCALAIFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

12.47%

-9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

23.54%

-16.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

28.76%

-19.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

30.24%

-19.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

30.24%

-19.05%

TCAL vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAL vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison

TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.10%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCAL and AIFD have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIFD has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to TCAL (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs AIFD's -33.20%.

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 72.57% vs 3.56% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 72.57% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.

TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 12.10%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

TCAL is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIFD is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.75% for AIFD.

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAL and AIFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer