PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAI vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAI vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAI achieves a 90.13% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 10.05% return.


TCAI

1D
2.62%
1M
22.37%
YTD
90.13%
6M
84.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GINN

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.63%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAI vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCAI and GINN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025

0.65

TCAI vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCAI
GINN

Technology

44.0%
32.4%

Industrials

29.9%
6.1%

Utilities

11.1%
1.9%

Financial Services

6.4%
11.4%

Energy

6.1%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
14.6%

Communication Services

1.1%
10.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Healthcare

-

18.6%

Technology

TCAI
44.0%
GINN
32.4%

Industrials

TCAI
29.9%
GINN
6.1%

Utilities

TCAI
11.1%
GINN
1.9%

Financial Services

TCAI
6.4%
GINN
11.4%

Energy

TCAI
6.1%
GINN
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TCAI
1.4%
GINN
14.6%

Communication Services

TCAI
1.1%
GINN
10.8%

Real Estate

TCAI
0.6%
GINN
0.8%

Basic Materials

TCAI

-

GINN
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

TCAI

-

GINN
2.0%

Healthcare

TCAI

-

GINN
18.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAI vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAI

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAI vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TCAI vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAIGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.66

0.46

+4.20

Drawdowns

TCAI vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAI drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAI and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAIGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-41.25%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-13.37%

+9.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

Volatility

TCAI vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAIGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.90%

16.01%

+19.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.90%

21.32%

+14.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.90%

21.05%

+14.85%

TCAI vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAI vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

TCAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GINN's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%
TCAI
Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF
0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAI and GINN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TCAI.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.03% for TCAI.

They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TCAI and 0.50% for GINN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAI and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer