PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. TGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TCAF vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TCAF vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
-6.88%15.45%20.93%8.40%
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
-11.99%15.62%29.94%11.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly higher than TGRW's -11.99% return.


TCAF

1D
2.98%
1M
-5.55%
YTD
-6.88%
6M
-5.12%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TGRW

1D
3.89%
1M
-5.72%
YTD
-11.99%
6M
-11.09%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCAF vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TCAF vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCAFTGRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

1.00

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.68

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.61

2.28

+1.33

TCAF vs. TGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the TGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and TGRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAFTGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.38

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and TGRW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TCAF vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.54%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and TGRW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAFTGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-43.33%

+26.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-18.84%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.66%

-15.68%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-12.72%

+10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

5.61%

-2.53%

Volatility

TCAF vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is 5.47%, while T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that TCAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TCAFTGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

7.09%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

13.18%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

23.00%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

23.28%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

23.20%

-9.08%