TCAF vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCAF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAF returned 20.51% vs 17.02% for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCAF charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

TCAF vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 7.48% return.

TCAF

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 6.51%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF	6.51%	15.45%	20.93%	8.40%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	7.48%	14.80%	13.45%	7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and TDVG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.83

The correlation between TCAF and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCAF vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCAF	TDVG
Technology	33.7%	24.1%
Healthcare	17.3%	12.9%
Communication Services	11.4%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	7.7%
Utilities	8.6%	3.9%
Financial Services	6.0%	19.5%
Industrials	4.6%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	7.1%
Energy	2.6%	5.8%
Basic Materials	0.1%	2.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.6%

Return for Risk

TCAF vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF

TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 47
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 51
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCAF	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.77	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.54	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	2.36	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.28	9.68	-2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCAF vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCAF	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	1.77	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	0.94	+0.32

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAF	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-19.20%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-7.24%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.19%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-3.76%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	1.76%	+1.06%

Volatility

TCAF vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.11%. This indicates that TCAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCAF	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.43%	2.11%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	7.45%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.47%	9.67%	+1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.94%	13.91%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.94%	13.93%	+0.01%

TCAF vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAF vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF	0.47%	0.50%	0.43%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAF and TDVG in my portfolio?

TCAF and TDVG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCAF or TDVG?

TCAF has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to TDVG (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, TCAF or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, TCAF leads with 20.51% vs 17.02% for TDVG. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCAF or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, TCAF has performed better with a 20.51% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAF or TDVG?

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAF or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

What is the main difference between TCAF and TDVG?

TCAF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.