PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBX vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.98% return. Over the past 10 years, TBX has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 2.14%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.54% annualized return.


TBX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.68%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
2.14%

SQQQ

1D
-2.42%
1M
2.09%
YTD
-40.98%
6M
-38.01%
1Y
-59.41%
3Y*
-54.63%
5Y*
-47.03%
10Y*
-56.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
2.39%-1.15%8.52%3.99%18.31%1.70%-9.96%-5.20%1.25%-2.61%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-40.98%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TBX and SQQQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2011

-0.13

The correlation between TBX and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBX
TBX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBXSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.79

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

-0.96

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

-1.84

+3.56

TBX vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBX and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBXSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-100.00%

+58.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-62.23%

+59.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.77%

-92.51%

+84.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.77%

-97.27%

+89.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.46%

-99.98%

+80.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.64%

-100.00%

+82.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.59%

-92.73%

+66.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

33.76%

-32.22%

Volatility

TBX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) is 1.48%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.22%. This indicates that TBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBXSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

26.22%

-24.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

43.25%

-39.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

53.47%

-48.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.45%

67.54%

-59.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

66.45%

-59.32%

TBX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TBX and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

TBX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than SQQQ's 10.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
10.12%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
2.90%3.45%6.58%4.07%0.40%0.00%0.10%1.53%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBX and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (26.22%) compared to TBX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBX dropped -41.04% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, TBX leads with 2.14% vs -56.54% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TBX has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TBX has performed better with a 2.14% return vs -56.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBX and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.12%, compared with 2.90% for TBX.

TBX is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TBX tracks ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).

TBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBX and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer