PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBX vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -44.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TBX has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 1.90%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.90% annualized return.


TBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.57%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
1.90%

SQQQ

1D
1.53%
1M
-22.29%
YTD
-44.43%
6M
-42.11%
1Y
-64.38%
3Y*
-55.94%
5Y*
-49.01%
10Y*
-55.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
2.92%-1.15%8.52%3.99%18.31%1.70%-9.96%-5.20%1.25%-2.61%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-44.43%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TBX and SQQQ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2011

-0.13

The correlation between TBX and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TBX vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TBX
SQQQ

Financial Services

55.0%
97.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TBX
55.0%
SQQQ
97.1%

Basic Materials

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Communication Services

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Energy

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Healthcare

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Industrials

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Real Estate

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Technology

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Utilities

TBX

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBX
TBX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBXSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.73

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

-0.98

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

-1.79

+3.31

TBX vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBX and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBXSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

-1.35

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

-0.74

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

-0.85

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

-0.88

+0.72

Drawdowns

TBX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBXSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-100.00%

+58.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-65.95%

+62.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.77%

-92.38%

+84.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.77%

-97.23%

+89.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.46%

-99.98%

+80.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.22%

-100.00%

+82.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.64%

-92.40%

+65.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

35.96%

-34.16%

Volatility

TBX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) is 1.68%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.81%. This indicates that TBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBXSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

13.81%

-12.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

36.46%

-33.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

47.79%

-42.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

66.61%

-58.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

66.10%

-58.96%

TBX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TBX and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

TBX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than SQQQ's 12.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.29%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
3.05%3.45%6.58%4.07%0.40%0.00%0.10%1.53%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBX and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to TBX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBX dropped -41.04% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, TBX leads with 1.90% vs -55.90% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TBX has been the lower-risk option at 1.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TBX has performed better with a 1.90% return vs -55.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBX and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.29%, compared with 3.05% for TBX.

TBX is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TBX tracks ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).

TBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBX and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer