TBUX vs. TGRW
TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TBUX returned 5.69%/yr vs 18.80%/yr for TGRW. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TBUX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.
Performance
TBUX vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBUX achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than TGRW's 1.59% return.
TBUX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.12%
TGRW
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 10.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.31M | $11.57M | $10.35M | |
| $198.19K | $243.99K | $608.29K |
TBUX vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 2.34% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 6.39% | -0.13% | -0.25% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 1.59% | 15.62% | 29.94% | 48.87% | -38.42% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBUX and TGRW is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between TBUX and TGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBUX vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank
TBUX
TGRW
TBUX vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBUX | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.88 | 1.11 | +1.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 44.44 | 0.55 | +43.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 162.37 | 1.59 | +160.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBUX vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBUX drawdown since its inception was -1.82%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBUX and TGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBUX | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -43.33% | +41.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -18.84% | +18.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.33% | -23.18% | +22.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.72% | +5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -12.29% | +12.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 6.43% | -6.40% |
Volatility
TBUX vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) is 0.16%, while T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that TBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBUX | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 6.20% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.49% | 14.52% | -14.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 18.22% | -17.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 23.52% | -22.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 23.00% | -21.94% |
TBUX vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBUX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBUX vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison
TBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.42% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBUX and TGRW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGRW has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to TBUX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBUX dropped -1.82% vs TGRW's -43.33%.
On 3-year performance, TGRW leads with 18.80% vs 5.69% for TBUX. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TGRW has performed better with a 18.80% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.
TBUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TBUX and 0.52% for TGRW.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.85 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBUX and TGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer