TBLGX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TBLGX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TBLGX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

TBLGX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TBLGX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 5.73%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 1Y: 16.24%
• 3Y*: 13.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLGX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBLGX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund	7.94%	15.49%	11.32%	16.91%	-16.41%	2.96%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and FRQHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021	0.79

The correlation between TBLGX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX

TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 68
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBLGX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLGX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBLGX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.36%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.36%	—	—

TBLGX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TBLGX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.25%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%
TBLGX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund	2.66%	2.87%	2.48%	2.21%	2.60%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLGX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

TBLGX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.