PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLAX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLAX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBLAX having a 5.80% return and URINX slightly higher at 5.93%.


TBLAX

1D
0.27%
1M
2.30%
YTD
5.80%
6M
6.14%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*

URINX

1D
0.25%
1M
2.40%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.30%
1Y
13.71%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
5.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLAX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund
5.80%12.08%8.71%12.41%-13.11%1.40%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.93%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLAX and URINX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.95

The correlation between TBLAX and URINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLAX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLAX
TBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLAX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLAXURINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.53

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.54

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

15.40

-1.36

TBLAX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLAX and URINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLAXURINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.68

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.15

-0.45

Drawdowns

TBLAX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLAX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLAX and URINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLAXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-15.27%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-3.92%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.58%

-4.84%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-1.92%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.90%

+0.12%

Volatility

TBLAX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) have volatilities of 1.87% and 1.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLAXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

1.91%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

4.24%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

5.17%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

6.29%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.51%

5.84%

+1.67%

TBLAX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLAX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

TBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than URINX's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund
3.44%3.64%2.33%2.45%3.65%2.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.77%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TBLAX and URINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URINX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to TBLAX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLAX dropped -18.31% vs URINX's -15.27%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLAX and URINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer