TBLA vs. NICE
TBLA (Taboola.com Ltd.) and NICE (NICE Ltd.) are both stocks. TBLA operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, TBLA returned -10.97%/yr vs -17.19%/yr for NICE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TBLA vs. NICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLA achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than NICE's -11.77% return.
TBLA
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 16.70%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 52.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- -10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
NICE
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- YTD
- -11.77%
- 1Y
- -35.59%
- 3Y*
- -21.22%
- 5Y*
- -17.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
TBLA vs. NICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLA Taboola.com Ltd. | 19.74% | 26.30% | -15.70% | 40.58% | -60.41% | -29.53% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | -11.77% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLA and NICE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between TBLA and NICE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TBLA:
$1.51B
NICE:
$5.84B
TBLA:
$0.36
NICE:
$8.52
TBLA:
15.26
NICE:
11.70
TBLA:
0.08
NICE:
0.35
TBLA:
1.02
NICE:
2.06
TBLA:
1.67
NICE:
1.64
TBLA:
$1.65B
NICE:
$3.01B
TBLA:
$579.78M
NICE:
$1.98B
TBLA:
$210.19M
NICE:
$841.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLA vs. NICE — Risk / Return Rank
TBLA
NICE
TBLA vs. NICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and NICE Ltd. (NICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBLA | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.87 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | -0.76 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | -1.20 | +4.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBLA vs. NICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLA drawdown since its inception was -85.51%, smaller than the maximum NICE drawdown of -93.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLA and NICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLA | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.51% | -93.23% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.01% | -51.19% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.84% | -68.21% | +20.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.47% | -73.60% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.00% | -68.34% | +18.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.31% | -35.27% | -27.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.46% | 32.47% | -17.01% |
Volatility
TBLA vs. NICE - Volatility Comparison
Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) has a higher volatility of 16.69% compared to NICE Ltd. (NICE) at 10.16%. This indicates that TBLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLA | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.69% | 10.16% | +6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.00% | 42.52% | -4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.32% | 51.48% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.32% | 39.92% | +19.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.29% | 33.27% | +26.02% |
Dividends
TBLA vs. NICE - Dividend Comparison
Neither TBLA nor NICE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
TBLA Taboola.com Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TBLA vs. NICE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taboola.com Ltd. and NICE Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TBLA vs. NICE - Profitability Comparison
TBLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a gross profit of 129.58M and revenue of 164.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
TBLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported an operating income of 69.38M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
TBLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a net income of 59.07M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in a net margin of 36.0%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLA and NICE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBLA has higher volatility (16.69%) compared to NICE (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLA dropped -85.51% vs NICE's -93.23%.
TBLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLA and NICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer