PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLA vs. AFRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBLA vs. AFRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLA achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than AFRM's -10.96% return.


TBLA

1D
-5.97%
1M
20.58%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
13.68%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10Y*

AFRM

1D
-6.68%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
-10.96%
6M
-4.84%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
61.61%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLA vs. AFRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.
-0.87%26.30%-15.70%40.58%-60.41%-24.83%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
-10.96%22.22%23.93%408.17%-90.38%49.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLA and AFRM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.45

The correlation between TBLA and AFRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TBLA:

$1.32B

AFRM:

$23.07B

EPS

TBLA:

$0.36

AFRM:

$1.10

PE Ratio

TBLA:

12.73

AFRM:

60.14

PS Ratio

TBLA:

0.85

AFRM:

7.19

PB Ratio

TBLA:

1.38

AFRM:

6.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBLA:

$1.65B

AFRM:

$3.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBLA:

$579.78M

AFRM:

$2.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBLA:

$210.19M

AFRM:

$908.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLA vs. AFRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLA
TBLA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TBLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRM
AFRM Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AFRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFRM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AFRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFRM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLA vs. AFRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLAAFRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.38

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

0.78

+1.05

TBLA vs. AFRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the AFRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLA and AFRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLAAFRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.34

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

-0.07

-0.19

Drawdowns

TBLA vs. AFRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLA drawdown since its inception was -84.76%, smaller than the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLA and AFRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLAAFRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.76%

-94.71%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-53.86%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.84%

-55.85%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.48%

-60.68%

+4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.56%

-68.73%

+8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.60%

26.61%

-11.01%

Volatility

TBLA vs. AFRM - Volatility Comparison

Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) has a higher volatility of 26.03% compared to Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) at 15.81%. This indicates that TBLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLAAFRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.03%

15.81%

+10.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.42%

42.81%

-7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.80%

60.53%

-15.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.29%

96.29%

-37.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.29%

95.58%

-36.29%

Dividends

TBLA vs. AFRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBLA nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TBLA vs. AFRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taboola.com Ltd. and Affirm Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
164.02M
268.03M
(TBLA) Total Revenue
(AFRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TBLA vs. AFRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taboola.com Ltd. and Affirm Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
0
Portfolio components
TBLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a gross profit of 129.58M and revenue of 164.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

AFRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TBLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported an operating income of 69.38M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.

AFRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

TBLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a net income of 59.07M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in a net margin of 36.0%.

AFRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TBLA and AFRM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLA has higher volatility (26.03%) compared to AFRM (15.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLA dropped -84.76% vs AFRM's -94.71%.

TBLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLA and AFRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer