TBIL vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TBIL (US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill 3 Month Index, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. TBIL is passively managed, while AMDL is actively managed. Over the past year, TBIL returned 3.93% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

TBIL vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.

TBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 8.25%
• 1M: 135.69%
• YTD: 395.18%
• 6M: 371.52%
• 1Y: 1,189.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBIL vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TBIL US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF	1.49%	4.19%	4.02%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	395.18%	103.00%	-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIL and AMDL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	-0.10

Return for Risk

TBIL vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIL

TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBIL vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBIL	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	13.78	9.30	+4.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	58.40	4.81	+53.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	17.16	1.63	+15.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	196.84	21.43	+175.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	934.41	42.08	+892.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBIL vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIL Sharpe Ratio is 13.78, which is higher than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 9.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIL and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBIL	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.78	9.30	+4.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	14.07	0.56	+13.51

Drawdowns

TBIL vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBIL	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-88.63%	+88.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-56.13%	+56.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-48.58%	+48.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	28.53%	-28.53%

Volatility

TBIL vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) is 0.08%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that TBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBIL	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	46.02%	-45.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.19%	94.09%	-93.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29%	129.41%	-129.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.32%	116.59%	-116.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.32%	116.59%	-116.27%

TBIL vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBIL vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBIL US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF	3.82%	4.07%	5.02%	5.00%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBIL and AMDL in my portfolio?

TBIL and AMDL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBIL or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to TBIL (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIL dropped -0.10% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, TBIL or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1189.78% vs 3.93% for TBIL. On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBIL or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1189.78% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBIL or AMDL?

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBIL or AMDL?

TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between TBIL and AMDL?

TBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 1.15% for AMDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.78 vs 9.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.