TBFG vs. LEXI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) and LEXI (Alexis Practical Tactical ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TBFG returned 21.35% vs 27.92% for LEXI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TBFG charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LEXI.

Performance

TBFG vs. LEXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFG achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than LEXI's 12.72% return.

TBFG

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 8.68%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 21.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LEXI

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 27.92%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFG vs. LEXI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	8.68%	14.56%	10.20%
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF	12.72%	19.23%	17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TBFG and LEXI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024	0.95

The correlation between TBFG and LEXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

TBFG vs. LEXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TBFG	LEXI
Technology	28.9%	33.0%
Financial Services	14.5%	12.6%
Industrials	12.0%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	9.5%
Healthcare	7.8%	7.3%
Communication Services	7.2%	7.3%
Energy	5.8%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	3.4%
Basic Materials	4.9%	6.1%
Utilities	2.6%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.7%

Return for Risk

TBFG vs. LEXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 67
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LEXI

LEXI Risk / Return Rank: 82
LEXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LEXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LEXI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LEXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LEXI Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFG vs. LEXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBFG	LEXI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.53	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.56	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	3.45	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	16.47	-4.62

TBFG vs. LEXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the LEXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFG and LEXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBFG vs. LEXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, smaller than the maximum LEXI drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and LEXI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBFG	LEXI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.43%	-22.01%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.63%	-8.12%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-1.20%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-5.14%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	1.70%	+0.11%

Volatility

TBFG vs. LEXI - Volatility Comparison

The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) at 3.83%. This indicates that TBFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBFG	LEXI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	3.83%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	9.34%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	11.13%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.18%	14.65%	-3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.18%	14.65%	-3.47%

TBFG vs. LEXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than LEXI's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBFG vs. LEXI - Dividend Comparison

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than LEXI's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF	0.84%	0.94%	2.17%	1.34%	0.95%	0.23%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.39%	2.65%	2.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBFG and LEXI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, TBFG and LEXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TBFG or LEXI?

TBFG has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to LEXI (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBFG dropped -13.43% vs LEXI's -22.01%.

Which ETF is better, TBFG or LEXI?

On 1-year performance, LEXI leads with 27.92% vs 21.35% for TBFG. On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, LEXI has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBFG or LEXI?

Over the 1-year period, LEXI has performed better with a 27.92% return vs 21.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBFG or LEXI?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LEXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBFG or LEXI?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.84% for LEXI.

What is the main difference between TBFG and LEXI?

They also come from different issuers: The Brinsmere Funds and Alexis. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for TBFG and 1.00% for LEXI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.