LEXI vs. GMMA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LEXI (Alexis Practical Tactical ETF) and GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. LEXI is actively managed, while GMMA is passively managed. Over the past year, LEXI returned 30.69% vs 9.99% for GMMA. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEXI charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GMMA.

Performance

LEXI vs. GMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEXI achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly higher than GMMA's 2.92% return.

LEXI

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 14.09%
• 6M: 13.37%
• 1Y: 30.69%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMMA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 2.80%
• 1Y: 9.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEXI vs. GMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF	14.09%	19.23%	2.52%
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF	2.92%	8.95%	0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LEXI and GMMA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.78

The correlation between LEXI and GMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LEXI vs. GMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEXI

LEXI Risk / Return Rank: 86
LEXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LEXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LEXI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LEXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LEXI Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GMMA

GMMA Risk / Return Rank: 54
GMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEXI vs. GMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEXI	GMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.68	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	2.34	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.33	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	2.96	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.13	9.73	+8.39

LEXI vs. GMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the GMMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEXI and GMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEXI vs. GMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEXI drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, which is greater than GMMA's maximum drawdown of -5.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXI and GMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEXI	GMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.01%	-5.21%	-16.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-3.39%	-4.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.07%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-1.24%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	1.03%	+0.67%

Volatility

LEXI vs. GMMA - Volatility Comparison

Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) at 2.99%. This indicates that LEXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEXI	GMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	2.99%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.26%	4.87%	+4.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.08%	5.99%	+5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	7.32%	+7.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	7.32%	+7.32%

LEXI vs. GMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEXI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEXI vs. GMMA - Dividend Comparison

LEXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than GMMA's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF	3.67%	3.00%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF	0.83%	0.94%	2.17%	1.34%	0.95%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEXI and GMMA in my portfolio?

LEXI and GMMA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEXI or GMMA?

LEXI has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to GMMA (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXI dropped -22.01% vs GMMA's -5.21%.

Which ETF is better, LEXI or GMMA?

On 1-year performance, LEXI leads with 30.69% vs 9.99% for GMMA. On fees, GMMA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GMMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LEXI or GMMA?

Over the 1-year period, LEXI has performed better with a 30.69% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LEXI or GMMA?

GMMA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LEXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LEXI or GMMA?

GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.83% for LEXI.

What is the main difference between LEXI and GMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Alexis and GammaRoad Capital Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for LEXI and 0.75% for GMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.