TBFG vs. DWAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. TBFG charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.

Performance

TBFG vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TBFG

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 11.14%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DWAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFG vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	6.10%
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%

TBFG vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TBFG	DWAT
Technology	21.5%	10.2%
Financial Services	17.7%	27.2%
Industrials	13.3%	25.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	5.2%
Healthcare	8.3%	5.3%
Energy	7.0%	4.2%
Communication Services	6.0%	3.4%
Basic Materials	6.0%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	6.5%
Utilities	3.4%	5.3%
Real Estate	2.4%	5.1%

Return for Risk

TBFG vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 75
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFG vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBFG	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBFG	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	—	—

Drawdowns

TBFG vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and DWAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBFG	DWAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.43%	0.00%	-13.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	0.00%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBFG	DWAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.73%	0.00%	+9.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.95%	0.00%	+10.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.95%	0.00%	+10.95%

TBFG vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBFG vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.35%	2.65%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, TBFG or DWAT?

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBFG or DWAT?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBFG or DWAT?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

What is the main difference between TBFG and DWAT?

They also come from different issuers: The Brinsmere Funds and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for TBFG and 1.83% for DWAT.