PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBFG vs. TDSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBFG vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBFG vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


TBFG

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
0.63%
6M
3.05%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDSA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBFG vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBFG vs. TDSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG
TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TDSA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFG vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBFGTDSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

TBFG vs. TDSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBFGTDSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

Dividends

TBFG vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
2.58%2.65%2.43%
TDSA
Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TBFG vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and TDSA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFGTDSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

0.00%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.92%

0.00%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

0.00%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

Volatility

TBFG vs. TDSA - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBFGTDSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

0.00%

+12.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

0.00%

+10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

0.00%

+10.98%