PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBFAX vs. TMAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFAX achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly lower than TMAAX's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, TBFAX has underperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 0.71%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


TBFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.02%
6M
-1.09%
YTD
-1.04%
1Y
1.45%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
0.71%
ALL TIME*
1.19%

TMAAX

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.30%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.04%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
9.51%
ALL TIME*
6.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBFAX
Thrivent Government Bond
-1.04%7.00%0.96%3.52%-10.67%-1.92%6.93%5.70%-0.02%1.79%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
8.04%15.13%19.29%17.06%-17.79%15.74%14.13%21.47%-6.30%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TBFAX and TMAAX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

-0.10

The correlation between TBFAX and TMAAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBFAX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBFAX
TBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TMAAX
TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBFAXTMAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

2.04

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

8.76

-6.78

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the TMAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFAX and TMAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFAX drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum TMAAX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFAX and TMAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFAXTMAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-50.54%

+32.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-7.55%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

-14.37%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.03%

-26.55%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.68%

-26.99%

+9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-1.10%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-7.31%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.75%

-0.38%

Volatility

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) is 0.90%, while Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that TBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBFAXTMAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.08%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

8.83%

-5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

10.94%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

14.00%

-8.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

13.29%

-8.57%

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBFAX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison

TBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than TMAAX's 6.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBFAX
Thrivent Government Bond
3.22%3.54%3.73%2.29%2.08%0.92%3.29%2.08%2.02%1.48%1.25%0.91%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
6.74%7.29%11.82%3.55%3.03%6.94%4.16%6.27%6.01%1.10%0.99%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBFAX and TMAAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMAAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to TBFAX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBFAX dropped -17.68% vs TMAAX's -50.54%.

TMAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBFAX and TMAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer