PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBFAX vs. FUTBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFAX achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than FUTBX's 0.18% return.


TBFAX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
-0.09%
10Y*
0.91%

FUTBX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.42%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBFAX
Thrivent Government Bond
-0.32%7.00%0.96%3.52%-10.67%-1.92%6.93%5.70%-0.02%1.79%
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.18%6.12%0.70%4.19%-13.00%-2.54%7.76%7.30%0.95%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TBFAX and FUTBX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.94

The correlation between TBFAX and FUTBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBFAX vs. FUTBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFAX
TBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTBX
FUTBX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FUTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBFAXFUTBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.16

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

3.16

+0.28

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the FUTBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFAX and FUTBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFAX drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum FUTBX drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFAX and FUTBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFAXFUTBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-19.69%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-3.09%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.55%

-5.42%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.03%

-17.03%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-7.51%

+3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-6.96%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.13%

+0.03%

Volatility

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) have volatilities of 1.12% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBFAXFUTBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.08%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.77%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

3.80%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.65%

5.81%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

5.15%

-0.42%

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBFAX vs. FUTBX - Dividend Comparison

TBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than FUTBX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.64%3.43%2.90%2.12%1.12%0.86%4.54%2.75%2.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%
TBFAX
Thrivent Government Bond
3.48%3.54%3.73%2.29%2.08%0.92%3.29%2.08%2.02%1.48%1.25%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TBFAX and FUTBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBFAX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to FUTBX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBFAX dropped -17.68% vs FUTBX's -19.69%.

TBFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBFAX and FUTBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer