PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXF vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXF vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXF achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 11.33% return.


TAXF

1D
0.00%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.30%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.16%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.38%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXF vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TAXF
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
2.22%4.30%1.74%7.33%-9.64%2.72%5.55%8.75%0.60%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
11.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TAXF and FDL is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXF vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXF
TAXF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TAXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXF vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAXFFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.32

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

4.94

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

11.71

-2.42

TAXF vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXF and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAXF vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXF drawdown since its inception was -13.93%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXF and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXFFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-65.93%

+52.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-4.27%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

-12.24%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.93%

-16.46%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-4.24%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-9.64%

+6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.80%

-0.99%

Volatility

TAXF vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) is 0.75%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that TAXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXFFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

3.52%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

8.03%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

11.51%

-8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.20%

14.30%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

17.13%

-12.49%

TAXF vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXF vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

TAXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, which matches FDL's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.74%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
TAXF
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
3.76%3.68%3.38%2.93%2.05%1.58%2.13%2.64%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXF and FDL have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to TAXF (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXF dropped -13.93% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.95% vs 1.13% for TAXF. On fees, TAXF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TAXF has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAXF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

TAXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.74% for FDL.

TAXF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TAXF and 0.43% for FDL.

TAXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXF and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer