TAUSX vs. JVMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX).
TAUSX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 31, 1991. JVMIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jun 2, 1997.
Performance
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.56% | 7.38% | 0.94% | 4.76% | -14.69% | -1.49% | 9.52% | 8.71% | -0.38% | 3.88% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 1.16% | 11.28% | 10.46% | 16.64% | -7.09% | 26.85% | 5.90% | 30.13% | -14.90% | 15.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than JVMIX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX has underperformed JVMIX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while JVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.
TAUSX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
JVMIX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAUSX vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank
TAUSX
JVMIX
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAUSX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.80 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.16 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 4.73 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAUSX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.80 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.45 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.50 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.29 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAUSX and JVMIX is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison
TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than JVMIX's 9.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.70% | 3.99% | 3.40% | 2.64% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 4.49% | 2.83% | 2.83% | 2.65% | 2.66% | 2.88% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 9.13% | 9.24% | 12.05% | 4.02% | 5.27% | 6.67% | 1.13% | 2.40% | 13.85% | 5.94% | 1.91% | 5.88% |
Drawdowns
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and JVMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAUSX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -67.04% | +47.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -13.22% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -21.13% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.90% | -42.64% | +22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -6.93% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -13.43% | +11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 3.23% | -2.17% |
Volatility
TAUSX vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) is 1.67%, while John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that TAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAUSX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 4.40% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 9.77% | -7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 18.11% | -13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 18.44% | -12.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 20.31% | -15.34% |