PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVMIX vs. WFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVMIX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 9.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JVMIX having a 10.24% annualized return and WFMIX not far ahead at 10.70%.


JVMIX

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
6.19%
6M
5.91%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
10.24%

WFMIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.31%
YTD
9.96%
6M
10.39%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
6.19%11.28%10.46%16.64%-7.09%26.85%5.90%30.13%-14.90%15.10%
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
9.96%6.14%11.95%9.54%-4.65%28.53%3.27%40.27%-13.12%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between JVMIX and WFMIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2005

0.95

The correlation between JVMIX and WFMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVMIX vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVMIX
JVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WFMIX
WFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVMIXWFMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.01

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.89

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.94

6.24

-0.30

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the WFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVMIX and WFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVMIXWFMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.57

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.47

-0.17

Drawdowns

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVMIX drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than WFMIX's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMIX and WFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVMIXWFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-52.70%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-9.66%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-18.30%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-22.13%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.64%

-43.80%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-0.73%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-7.49%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.93%

-0.27%

Volatility

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) is 3.22%, while Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that JVMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVMIXWFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.99%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

10.53%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

13.95%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

17.19%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

18.91%

+1.41%

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVMIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVMIX vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison

JVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, less than WFMIX's 10.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.70%9.24%12.05%4.02%5.27%6.67%1.13%2.40%13.85%5.94%1.91%5.88%
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.23%11.24%8.00%5.51%8.71%9.87%0.66%7.48%2.74%4.41%1.44%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JVMIX and WFMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WFMIX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to JVMIX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVMIX dropped -67.04% vs WFMIX's -52.70%.

WFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVMIX and WFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer