TAUSX vs. BIMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX).
TAUSX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 31, 1991. BIMIX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.56% | 7.38% | 0.94% | 4.76% | -14.69% | -1.49% | 9.52% | 8.71% | -0.38% | 3.88% |
BIMIX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional | -0.34% | 6.69% | 3.45% | 5.78% | -8.64% | -1.41% | 7.42% | 7.05% | 0.58% | 2.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BIMIX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX has underperformed BIMIX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while BIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.23% annualized return.
TAUSX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
BIMIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAUSX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank
TAUSX
BIMIX
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAUSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.48 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 2.18 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.04 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 8.17 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAUSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.48 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.34 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.69 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.17 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAUSX and BIMIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison
TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, which matches BIMIX's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.70% | 3.99% | 3.40% | 2.64% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 4.49% | 2.83% | 2.83% | 2.65% | 2.66% | 2.88% |
BIMIX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional | 3.67% | 3.67% | 3.89% | 3.21% | 2.17% | 2.27% | 3.49% | 2.52% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 2.21% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than BIMIX's maximum drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and BIMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAUSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -12.76% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -2.07% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -12.76% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.90% | -12.76% | -7.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -1.60% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -1.49% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.52% | +0.54% |
Volatility
TAUSX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) at 1.05%. This indicates that TAUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAUSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 1.05% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 1.65% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 2.79% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 3.87% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 3.25% | +1.72% |