PortfoliosLab logo
BIMIX vs. MMIBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BIMIX and MMIBX is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

BIMIX vs. MMIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) and MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
141.32%
109.14%
BIMIX
MMIBX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIMIX:

1.92

MMIBX:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

BIMIX:

2.90

MMIBX:

0.30

Omega Ratio

BIMIX:

1.36

MMIBX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

BIMIX:

1.19

MMIBX:

0.13

Martin Ratio

BIMIX:

6.35

MMIBX:

0.65

Ulcer Index

BIMIX:

1.00%

MMIBX:

1.81%

Daily Std Dev

BIMIX:

3.32%

MMIBX:

5.99%

Max Drawdown

BIMIX:

-12.76%

MMIBX:

-16.77%

Current Drawdown

BIMIX:

-0.76%

MMIBX:

-6.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMIX achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than MMIBX's -1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMIX has outperformed MMIBX with an annualized return of 2.12%, while MMIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.51% annualized return.


BIMIX

YTD

2.46%

1M

0.22%

6M

2.43%

1Y

6.32%

5Y*

0.97%

10Y*

2.12%

MMIBX

YTD

-1.75%

1M

1.52%

6M

-1.30%

1Y

0.69%

5Y*

0.89%

10Y*

1.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIMIX vs. MMIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MMIBX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIMIX vs. MMIBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIMIX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIMIX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIMIX is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIMIX is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIMIX is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIMIX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MMIBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMIBX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMIBX is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMIBX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMIBX is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMIBX is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMIBX is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BIMIX vs. MMIBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) and MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the MMIBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMIX and MMIBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.92
0.12
BIMIX
MMIBX

Dividends

BIMIX vs. MMIBX - Dividend Comparison

BIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than MMIBX's 2.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
3.97%3.89%3.20%2.18%1.58%2.16%2.53%2.52%2.33%2.29%2.27%2.41%
MMIBX
MFS Municipal Income Fund
2.61%2.75%2.47%1.92%1.45%1.86%2.29%2.69%2.69%2.88%2.75%2.70%

Drawdowns

BIMIX vs. MMIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.76%, smaller than the maximum MMIBX drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMIX and MMIBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.76%
-6.48%
BIMIX
MMIBX

Volatility

BIMIX vs. MMIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) is 1.20%, while MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that BIMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.20%
3.63%
BIMIX
MMIBX