TARK vs. PTIR
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TARK returned 58.98% vs -8.22% for PTIR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
TARK vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -38.16% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -10.60%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- -38.16%
- 6M
- -34.27%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TARK vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -1.67% | 41.00% | 63.67% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -38.16% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and PTIR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between TARK and PTIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
PTIR
TARK vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TARK | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | -0.08 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 0.60 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.12 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | -0.20 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TARK | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | -0.08 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 2.23 | -2.30 |
Drawdowns
TARK vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -69.10% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -68.11% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.30% | -57.38% | +22.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -27.38% | -23.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.21% | 39.35% | -10.14% |
Volatility
TARK vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is 17.93%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 34.02%. This indicates that TARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.93% | 34.02% | -16.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | 75.99% | -25.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.71% | 102.25% | -30.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 129.30% | -38.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 129.30% | -38.70% |
TARK vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TARK and PTIR have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
TARK vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.51%, more than PTIR's 9.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 9.40% | 5.81% | 0.00% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 30.51% | 30.00% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and PTIR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (34.02%) compared to TARK (17.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs PTIR's -69.10%.
On 1-year performance, TARK leads with 58.98% vs -8.22% for PTIR. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 17.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a 58.98% return vs -8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TARK and PTIR have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 9.40% for PTIR.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and GraniteShares.
TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARK and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer