PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARK vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.35% return.


TARK

1D
-3.51%
1M
6.42%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-5.56%
1Y
58.98%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
2.35%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-1.67%41.00%-4.85%38.26%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.35%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and IBIC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

-0.00

The correlation between TARK and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TARKIBICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

4.97

-4.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

8.97

-7.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

2.21

-1.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

17.05

-15.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.19

66.57

-64.39

TARK vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TARKIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

4.97

-4.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

3.49

-3.55

Drawdowns

TARK vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-0.90%

-76.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-0.26%

-57.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.30%

-0.15%

-35.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-0.10%

-50.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.21%

0.07%

+29.14%

Volatility

TARK vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 17.93% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.34%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.93%

0.34%

+17.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.05%

0.67%

+49.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.71%

0.90%

+70.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.60%

1.58%

+89.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.60%

1.58%

+89.02%

TARK vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARK vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.51%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
30.51%30.00%0.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARK and IBIC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (17.93%) compared to IBIC (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, TARK leads with 58.98% vs 4.48% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a 58.98% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AXS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARK and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer