TARK vs. BRKW
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.
Performance
TARK vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -8.59% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKW
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -9.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TARK vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -1.67% | 20.55% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -8.59% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and BRKW is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
BRKW
TARK vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TARK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TARK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.41 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
TARK vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and BRKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -12.64% | -65.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.30% | -11.51% | -23.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -5.32% | -45.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.21% | — | — |
Volatility
TARK vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.71% | 17.24% | +54.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 17.24% | +73.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.60% | 17.24% | +73.36% |
TARK vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TARK vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.51%, more than BRKW's 25.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 25.42% | 14.45% | 0.00% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 30.51% | 30.00% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and BRKW have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 25.42% for BRKW.
TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.99% for BRKW.
Find the right allocation for TARK and BRKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer