PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. BRKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARK vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -3.91% return.


TARK

1D
-4.11%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-18.36%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
10Y*

BRKW

1D
1.29%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-3.91%
6M
-3.53%
1Y
-2.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-10.45%31.03%
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
-3.91%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and BRKW is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BRKW
BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TARKBRKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.99

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.19

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

-0.39

+0.44

TARK vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the BRKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and BRKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TARK vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and BRKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKBRKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-12.64%

-65.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-12.64%

-44.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.07%

-6.97%

-34.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.80%

-5.45%

-45.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.71%

6.35%

+24.36%

Volatility

TARK vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 24.92% compared to Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) at 4.52%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKBRKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.92%

4.52%

+20.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.17%

12.76%

+40.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.40%

17.21%

+54.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.67%

17.14%

+73.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.67%

17.14%

+73.53%

TARK vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARK vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.49%, more than BRKW's 25.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
25.43%14.45%0.00%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
33.49%30.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARK and BRKW have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (24.92%) compared to BRKW (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs BRKW's -12.64%.

On 1-year performance, TARK leads with 1.64% vs -2.44% for BRKW. On fees, BRKW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BRKW has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a 1.64% return vs -2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRKW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 33.49%, compared with 25.43% for BRKW.

TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.99% for BRKW.

TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARK and BRKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer