BRKW vs. AMZW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) and AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BRKW returned 5.95% vs 31.96% for AMZW. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

BRKW vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKW achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than AMZW's 23.96% return.

BRKW

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 4.17%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 1Y: 5.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.79%

AMZW

• 1D: 5.03%
• 1M: 19.54%
• 6M: 17.05%
• YTD: 23.96%
• 1Y: 31.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	$848.43K	$621.57K	$755.11K
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	$143.27K	$155.39K	$128.47K

BRKW vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	0.16%	1.85%
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	23.96%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKW and AMZW is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.04

BRKW vs. AMZW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRKW	AMZW
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	20.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BRKW vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 18
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 17

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRKW vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKW	AMZW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	0.77	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	1.45	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.17	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	1.20	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.93	2.51	-1.58

BRKW vs. AMZW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the AMZW Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKW and AMZW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRKW vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKW drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum AMZW drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKW and AMZW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKW	AMZW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-26.79%	+14.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-26.79%	+14.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	0.00%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-9.70%	+4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.41%	12.77%	-6.36%

Volatility

BRKW vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) is 5.10%, while Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a volatility of 20.06%. This indicates that BRKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKW	AMZW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	20.06%	-14.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	32.14%	-18.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	41.77%	-24.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	41.18%	-23.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.30%	41.18%	-23.88%

BRKW vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BRKW and AMZW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

BRKW vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison

BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.21%, less than AMZW's 39.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	39.09%	25.29%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	23.21%	14.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKW and AMZW in my portfolio?

BRKW and AMZW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRKW or AMZW?

AMZW has higher volatility (20.06%) compared to BRKW (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKW dropped -12.64% vs AMZW's -26.79%.

Which ETF is better, BRKW or AMZW?

On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 31.96% vs 5.95% for BRKW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BRKW has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRKW or AMZW?

Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 31.96% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKW or AMZW?

BRKW and AMZW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKW or AMZW?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 39.09%, compared with 23.21% for BRKW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.