TARK vs. BMNG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

TARK vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -11.81% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -81.40% return.

TARK

• 1D: -7.48%
• 1M: -7.16%
• 6M: -21.21%
• YTD: -11.81%
• 1Y: -15.48%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -4.29%
• 1M: -14.65%
• 6M: -84.91%
• YTD: -81.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	-11.81%	-28.48%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-81.40%	-80.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and BMNG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

TARK vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK

TARK Risk / Return Rank: 8
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 9
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BMNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TARK	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	—	—

Drawdowns

TARK vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TARK	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	-97.32%	+19.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.97%	-96.53%	+54.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.59%	-83.35%	+32.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TARK	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.01%	186.57%	-114.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.31%	186.57%	-96.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.31%	186.57%	-96.26%

TARK vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TARK vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.01%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	34.01%	30.00%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TARK and BMNG in my portfolio?

TARK and BMNG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TARK or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TARK or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TARK or BMNG?

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 34.01%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

What is the main difference between TARK and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.75% for BMNG.