FLR vs. STRL

In the year-to-date period, FLR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 101.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FLR has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of -0.76%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 39.26% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLR and STRL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FLR nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FLR drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, roughly equal to the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLR and STRL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fluor Corporation (FLR) is 9.46%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 12.34%. This indicates that FLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fluor Corporation and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.