FLR vs. STRL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLR or STRL.
Key characteristics
| FLR | STRL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.96% | 15.55% |
| 1Y Return | 38.93% | 170.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 20.68% | 69.77% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.07% | 50.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -4.97% | 28.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.02 | 3.62 |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.91% | 48.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.89% | -92.51% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.20% | -10.43% |
Fundamentals
| FLR | STRL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.97B | $3.30B |
| EPS | $0.54 | $4.44 |
| PE Ratio | 75.83 | 23.85 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.33 | 1.06 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.47B | $1.97B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $355.00M | $274.57M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $334.00M | $264.07M |
Correlation
The correlation between FLR and STRL is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLR vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLR achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FLR has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of -4.97%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 28.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLR vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLR vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLR nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.39% | 0.80% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLR vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLR drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, roughly equal to the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLR and STRL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLR vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fluor Corporation (FLR) is 6.45%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that FLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FLR vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fluor Corporation and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities