FLR vs. GVA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA).

Performance

FLR vs. GVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLR vs. GVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLR Fluor Corporation	17.71%	-19.65%	25.91%	13.01%	39.93%	55.10%	-14.55%	-39.54%	-36.61%	0.15%
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated	4.04%	32.23%	73.75%	46.84%	-7.82%	46.80%	-0.65%	-30.28%	-35.80%	16.45%

Fundamentals

EPS FLR : -$2.98 GVA : $3.64
PS Ratio FLR : 0.35 GVA : 1.44
Total Revenue (TTM) FLR : $15.50B GVA : $4.42B
Gross Profit (TTM) FLR : -$120.00M GVA : $711.22M
EBITDA (TTM) FLR : -$378.00M GVA : $467.37M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLR achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly higher than GVA's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FLR has underperformed GVA with an annualized return of -0.49%, while GVA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.

FLR

• 1D: 6.56%
• 1M: -10.82%
• YTD: 17.71%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: 15.20%
• 10Y*: -0.49%

GVA

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -10.74%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 9.57%
• 1Y: 59.76%
• 3Y*: 44.02%
• 5Y*: 25.91%
• 10Y*: 11.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FLR vs. GVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLR

FLR Risk / Return Rank: 61
FLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FLR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FLR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GVA

GVA Risk / Return Rank: 93
GVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GVA Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GVA Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLR vs. GVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLR	GVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	2.42	-1.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	3.47	-2.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.42	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	4.12	-3.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	13.74	-12.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLR vs. GVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the GVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLR and GVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLR	GVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	2.42	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.88	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.27	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.25	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between FLR and GVA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FLR vs. GVA - Dividend Comparison

FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLR Fluor Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.63%	3.87%	2.61%	1.63%	1.60%	1.78%
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated	0.43%	0.45%	0.59%	1.02%	1.48%	1.34%	1.95%	1.88%	1.29%	0.82%	0.95%	1.21%

Drawdowns

FLR vs. GVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLR drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, which is greater than GVA's maximum drawdown of -84.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLR and GVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLR	GVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.89%	-84.72%	-11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.19%	-14.69%	-15.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.63%	-39.44%	-8.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.16%	-84.72%	-9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.56%	-11.88%	-31.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.62%	-31.29%	-10.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.38%	4.40%	+13.98%

Volatility

FLR vs. GVA - Volatility Comparison

Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a higher volatility of 15.30% compared to Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) at 9.15%. This indicates that FLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLR	GVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.30%	9.15%	+6.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.87%	16.15%	+14.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.99%	24.86%	+28.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.44%	29.65%	+15.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.29%	41.15%	+16.14%

Financials

FLR vs. GVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fluor Corporation and Granite Construction Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 133.00M and revenue of 4.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.2%.

GVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a gross profit of 167.72M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.4%.

FLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 53.00M and revenue of 4.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

GVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported an operating income of 74.98M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

FLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of -1.87B and revenue of 4.18B, resulting in a net margin of -44.8%.

GVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a net income of 52.03M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.