PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGS vs. IBTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGS vs. IBTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBTI's 0.62% return.


TAGS

1D
-0.88%
1M
2.74%
6M
8.07%
YTD
7.86%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
-7.68%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
-0.46%
ALL TIME*
-4.75%

IBTI

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.02%
6M
0.44%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.62M$10.68M$9.14M
$388.58K$387.70K$588.98K

TAGS vs. IBTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
7.86%-8.76%-14.57%-6.11%16.25%27.05%12.67%
IBTI
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF
0.62%6.15%2.52%4.65%-11.32%-3.50%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGS and IBTI is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

-0.06

The correlation between TAGS and IBTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGS vs. IBTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTI
IBTI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAGS vs. IBTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAGSIBTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

2.86

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

9.04

-7.88

TAGS vs. IBTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the IBTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGS and IBTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAGS vs. IBTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than IBTI's maximum drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and IBTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGSIBTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.40%

-18.45%

-57.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-1.10%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-2.81%

-25.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

-16.18%

-21.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.09%

-3.61%

-59.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.28%

-8.14%

-49.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

0.35%

+3.46%

Volatility

TAGS vs. IBTI - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI) at 0.39%. This indicates that TAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGSIBTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

0.39%

+5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

1.15%

+10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

1.65%

+11.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

4.97%

+11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

5.11%

+12.87%

TAGS vs. IBTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TAGS vs. IBTI - Dividend Comparison

TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTI
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF
3.45%3.87%3.92%3.27%1.70%0.90%0.56%
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAGS and IBTI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAGS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to IBTI (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs IBTI's -18.45%.

On 5-year performance, IBTI leads with -0.11% vs -0.84% for TAGS. On fees, IBTI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTI has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IBTI has performed better with a -0.11% return vs -0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for TAGS.

IBTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.

TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while IBTI is Government Bonds. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while IBTI tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.07% for IBTI.

IBTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGS and IBTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer