TAGRX vs. JHTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX).
TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984. JHTFX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1993.
Performance
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -8.29% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
JHTFX John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.34% | 3.07% | 6.57% | 6.84% | -16.77% | 5.69% | 4.65% | 9.50% | 0.61% | 6.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGRX achieves a -8.29% return, which is significantly lower than JHTFX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGRX has outperformed JHTFX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while JHTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.
TAGRX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
JHTFX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 0.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGRX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than JHTFX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAGRX vs. JHTFX — Risk / Return Rank
TAGRX
JHTFX
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGRX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.15 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 0.25 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 0.31 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 0.73 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGRX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.15 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.05 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.41 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.93 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGRX and JHTFX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Dividend Comparison
TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.18%, more than JHTFX's 5.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.18% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
JHTFX John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 5.09% | 6.24% | 4.03% | 3.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.76% | 6.05% | 4.45% | 4.55% | 4.43% | 4.67% |
Drawdowns
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than JHTFX's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGRX and JHTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGRX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -22.40% | -36.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.04% | -7.36% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.10% | -22.40% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -22.40% | -14.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.64% | -2.94% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -2.91% | -8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 3.06% | +1.07% |
Volatility
TAGRX vs. JHTFX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) at 1.51%. This indicates that TAGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAGRX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 1.51% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 2.39% | +7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 7.54% | +11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 5.83% | +14.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 5.55% | +14.95% |