PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHTFX vs. TMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHTFX achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than TMNIX's 1.84% return.


JHTFX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.53%
YTD
3.21%
6M
3.96%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
2.36%

TMNIX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.78%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.03%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JHTFX
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.21%3.07%6.57%6.84%-16.77%5.69%4.65%9.50%0.60%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
1.84%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.73%8.70%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between JHTFX and TMNIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.59

The correlation between JHTFX and TMNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHTFX vs. TMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHTFX
JHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHTFXTMNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.65

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.78

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

7.68

+0.01

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the TMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHTFX and TMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHTFX drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, which is greater than TMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHTFX and TMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHTFXTMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.40%

-4.63%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-2.26%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

-4.61%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-4.63%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-1.47%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.82%

+0.17%

Volatility

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) at 0.65%. This indicates that JHTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHTFXTMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.65%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

1.98%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

2.55%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.89%

3.04%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.57%

2.68%

+2.89%

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHTFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TMNIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHTFX vs. TMNIX - Dividend Comparison

JHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than TMNIX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHTFX
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
5.05%6.24%4.03%3.29%3.48%3.44%3.76%6.05%4.45%4.55%4.43%4.67%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.12%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHTFX and TMNIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHTFX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to TMNIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHTFX dropped -22.40% vs TMNIX's -4.63%.

TMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHTFX and TMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer