TAGRX vs. FGJEX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TAGRX (John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund) and FGJEX (Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, TAGRX returned 11.73% vs 20.83% for FGJEX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TAGRX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FGJEX.

Performance

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGRX achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than FGJEX's 10.81% return.

TAGRX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: 1.77%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 1Y: 11.73%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: 12.00%
• ALL TIME*: 8.71%

FGJEX

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: 7.67%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 1Y: 20.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	1.91%	20.34%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	10.81%	24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGRX and FGJEX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.81

The correlation between TAGRX and FGJEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TAGRX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAGRX

TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 16
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FGJEX

FGJEX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FGJEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FGJEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FGJEX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FGJEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FGJEX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAGRX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.68	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	2.39	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.30	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.23	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	9.43	-7.37

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FGJEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGRX and FGJEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGRX and FGJEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAGRX	FGJEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.45%	-8.32%	-50.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.04%	-8.32%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	0.00%	-2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.51%	-1.01%	-10.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	1.97%	+2.20%

Volatility

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX) at 2.92%. This indicates that TAGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAGRX	FGJEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	2.92%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.39%	8.30%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.47%	11.04%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.26%	10.86%	+9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.46%	10.86%	+9.60%

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGRX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAGRX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison

TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, more than FGJEX's 8.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	8.60%	9.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	11.87%	12.09%	13.00%	6.67%	6.76%	7.82%	0.30%	0.53%	14.05%	8.22%	2.96%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAGRX and FGJEX in my portfolio?

TAGRX and FGJEX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAGRX or FGJEX?

TAGRX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FGJEX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGRX dropped -58.45% vs FGJEX's -8.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGJEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.