PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGRX vs. GOIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGRX achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than GOIGX's 9.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGRX has outperformed GOIGX with an annualized return of 12.00%, while GOIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.


TAGRX

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.19%
6M
1.77%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
12.00%
ALL TIME*
8.71%

GOIGX

1D
3.41%
1M
-2.99%
6M
3.15%
YTD
9.02%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.23%
ALL TIME*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAGRX
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund
1.91%9.98%21.14%32.23%-24.86%29.16%20.55%35.06%-14.09%19.63%
GOIGX
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A
9.02%29.39%10.41%12.55%-27.00%9.33%22.08%27.45%-12.31%36.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGRX and GOIGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.77

The correlation between TAGRX and GOIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGRX vs. GOIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAGRX
TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GOIGX
GOIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GOIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAGRXGOIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.28

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

4.62

-2.57

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the GOIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGRX and GOIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than GOIGX's maximum drawdown of -54.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGRX and GOIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGRXGOIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-54.60%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-13.75%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.11%

-13.75%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.10%

-38.46%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-38.46%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-6.98%

+4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-12.56%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

3.81%

+0.36%

Volatility

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) is 3.54%, while John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that TAGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGRXGOIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

7.51%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

18.58%

-8.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

20.56%

-7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

17.62%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

17.21%

+3.25%

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGRX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GOIGX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAGRX vs. GOIGX - Dividend Comparison

TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, while GOIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOIGX
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.48%2.39%13.77%15.05%0.00%0.40%2.58%0.23%0.62%0.14%
TAGRX
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund
11.87%12.09%13.00%6.67%6.76%7.82%0.30%0.53%14.05%8.22%2.96%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAGRX and GOIGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOIGX has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to TAGRX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGRX dropped -58.45% vs GOIGX's -54.60%.

GOIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGRX and GOIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer