TAGG vs. TDVG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG).

TAGG and TDVG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAGG is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2021. TDVG is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 4, 2020.

Performance

TAGG vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TAGG vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF	0.05%	7.40%	1.73%	5.72%	-12.63%	0.01%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	-0.44%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	9.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGG achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's -0.44% return.

TAGG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 3.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: 2.12%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGG vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

TDVG

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF

TAGG

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF

Return for Risk

TAGG vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGG

TAGG Risk / Return Rank: 44
TAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
TAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
TAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 49
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGG vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAGG	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.78	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.19	+0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	1.15	+0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.15	5.46	-2.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAGG vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGG and TDVG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAGG	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.78	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.86	-0.82

Correlation

The correlation between TAGG and TDVG is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TAGG vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

TAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than TDVG's 1.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF	4.53%	4.36%	4.36%	3.48%	3.67%	0.33%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	1.06%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Drawdowns

TAGG vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGG drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGG and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAGG	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-19.20%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.63%	-11.17%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-5.31%	+3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-3.84%	-3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	2.36%	-0.92%

Volatility

TAGG vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) is 1.56%, while T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that TAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAGG	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	4.12%	-2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	7.58%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.75%	15.03%	-10.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	13.93%	-7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.62%	14.04%	-7.42%