PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGG vs. TCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TAGG vs. TCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TAGG vs. TCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
0.16%7.40%1.73%5.72%-12.63%0.01%
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
-10.79%18.40%36.06%50.10%-37.81%3.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGG achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than TCHP's -10.79% return.


TAGG

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
0.16%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TCHP

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-10.79%
6M
-9.58%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TAGG vs. TCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TCHP's 0.57% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TAGG vs. TCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGG
TAGG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TCHP
TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGG vs. TCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAGGTCHPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.68

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.15

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.96

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.92

3.29

-0.37

TAGG vs. TCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the TCHP Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGG and TCHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAGGTCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.68

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.45

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between TAGG and TCHP is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TAGG vs. TCHP - Dividend Comparison

TAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
4.52%4.36%4.36%3.48%3.67%0.33%
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Drawdowns

TAGG vs. TCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGG drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum TCHP drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGG and TCHP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGGTCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-42.34%

+25.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-17.50%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-13.51%

+11.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-11.71%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

5.10%

-3.65%

Volatility

TAGG vs. TCHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) is 1.57%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that TAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TAGGTCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

7.12%

-5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

13.00%

-10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

23.06%

-18.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

23.44%

-16.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

23.37%

-16.75%