TAFL vs. CERY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TAFL (AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF) and CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAFL is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while CERY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. TAFL is actively managed, while CERY is passively managed. Over the past year, TAFL returned 8.23% vs 26.17% for CERY. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.28% expense ratio.

Performance

TAFL vs. CERY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFL achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 19.54% return.

TAFL

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CERY

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -8.39%
• YTD: 19.54%
• 6M: 18.91%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAFL vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TAFL AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF	2.47%	3.53%	-0.63%
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	19.54%	15.68%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TAFL and CERY is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	-0.09

Return for Risk

TAFL vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAFL

TAFL Risk / Return Rank: 64
TAFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TAFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TAFL Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TAFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
TAFL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CERY

CERY Risk / Return Rank: 50
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAFL vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAFL	CERY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.68	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.26	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	2.31	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.35	9.93	-0.57

TAFL vs. CERY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the CERY Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFL and CERY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAFL vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFL drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, smaller than the maximum CERY drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFL and CERY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAFL	CERY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-11.37%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-11.37%	+8.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.37%	+11.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-2.27%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	2.83%	-1.95%

Volatility

TAFL vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) is 0.94%, while SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that TAFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAFL	CERY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	3.57%	-2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	13.57%	-10.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.24%	15.63%	-11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.15%	14.73%	-9.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	14.73%	-9.58%

TAFL vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TAFL and CERY have an expense ratio of 0.28%.

Dividends

TAFL vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison

TAFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than CERY's 4.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.18%	4.99%	0.52%	0.00%
TAFL AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF	4.07%	4.11%	3.88%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAFL and CERY in my portfolio?

TAFL and CERY have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAFL or CERY?

CERY has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to TAFL (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFL dropped -6.01% vs CERY's -11.37%.

Which ETF is better, TAFL or CERY?

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 26.17% vs 8.23% for TAFL. Both ETFs have the same 0.28% expense ratio. On volatility, TAFL has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TAFL or CERY?

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 26.17% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TAFL or CERY?

TAFL and CERY have the same expense ratio: 0.28% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TAFL or CERY?

CERY has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 4.07% for TAFL.

What is the main difference between TAFL and CERY?

TAFL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CERY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.